“The Sedona Method” from 1985: Deal With Feelings in a Healthy Way

I became a licensed psychotherapist in 1983, and when I moved back to  New York in 1984, a friend invited me to take “The Sedona Method”. I already had 2 Masters Degrees….one in Genetic Counseling, and the other in Clinical Social Work. I was always open for more learning.

Initially, when asked to take the course, I was not that eager, because a few months prior, someone had invited me to take the “Forum”, a new incarnation of “EST”. The Forum was a very long all weekend program, taught with 200 people in a room, with instructors who appeared to be angry and aggressive. The teaching style actually seemed hostile. I discovered later that one goal of the Forum in 1985 was to teach people to be “responsible”.  Since I was always a very responsible and mature person, the course was useless for me, and a waste of my time and money.

With some reticence after that experience, but with an enthusiastic recommendation from a friend, I signed up for “The Sedona Method”, which was very different from the Forum, in the realm of the concept of “control issues”.

I used the word, “control”, because one of the teachings of the Sedona Method dealt with the feelings that come up around control issues.  “Releasing the need for the feeling of control” is one of the hallmark processes.  As an example, if you are stuck in traffic, and are feeling angry because you cannot change the traffic issue, the Sedona Institute teaching from 1985 provided a method to “release” the anger on the surface, in order to connect with the feelings of fear or sadness below. As a Licensed Psychotherapist, I knew that the Sedona Method, with its gentle technique of teaching 8 people around a conference table, was using instruction that was gentle and respected the feelings of the students.

While I felt that the Forum of 1985 taught how to repress feelings and rationalize feeldings, the Sedona Method of 1985 taught how to identify the feeling and release it.

Lester Levinson created the original Sedona Method, and I am so grateful that I took the original course. I have listened to some of the conference calls for people who are claiming to teach Lester Levinson’s course, but it is not something that provides value to me, or that I can recommend.  It is very different from the original method. In my opinion, it is sad that the original “Sedona Institute” is no longer around. If someone knows how to find the original program, please let me know.

There is an expression, “What we resist, persists”.  Denying  a problem or feeling can result in depression, or destructive behavior. In my professional opinion, we cannot heal a feeling unless we are aware of it. The original “Sedona Method” taught the graduates to gently allow feelings into awareness, in order to deal with them appropriately.

Action Tips:

1) Ask yourself, “What am I feeling now?”

2) If you are feeling angry, allow yourself to feel the feeling completely. Then ask yourself if you might be sad or fearful under the anger.

3) If you are feeling afraid or sad, notice if you are trying to deny or rationalize it away. Then try to actually feel the feelings, or do some journal writing about your feelings.

I thank the Sedona Institute of 1985 for teaching people to manage their feelings in a healthy manner, and hope that someday, this original method of teaching will be available again.

 

NBC, CNBC, NBR..A Humorous View of “NEXT…BUT FIRST…”

What role do mainstream media have in modeling proper communication and language skills?

My name is Ellen Anmuth MS, MSW, LCSW – Licensed Psychotherapist, Genetic Counselor and Founder/Creator of “The Language Of Solutions”, a wellness and communication/conflict resolution training program.

This new blog, www.TheLanguageOfSolutions.net, was created in order to focus attention on communication skills enhancement. Will the continual  improper use of grammar and language by major television networks causes a further deterioration of linguistic skills in America?

I have a personal fondness for NBC. My uncle,who passed away recently, had a long career with the news department at NBC in New York.  He got me tickets to see Saturday Night Live in 1975, the Christmas Show with Candace Bergen as the guest host. I felt so fortunate to see the original cast live…such treasured actors as Laraine Newman, John Belushi, Jane Curtin, Gilda Radner, Dan Aykroyd, Garrett Morris and Chevy Chase.

I have the utmost respect  for NBC News. Therefore, I will attempt this article with some humor and kindness, and with the serious message of request that NBC News make some changes in the mis-use of the English Language. Could NBC’s repeated incorrect use of English  be teaching its viewers to speak incorrectly?

There is a Saturday Night Live bit called “Really”, where Seth Meyers goes on a rant about an issue. (Amy Poehler had done the segment with him when she was still on the show.) Here is my attempt at the SNL bit:

I watched NBR (Nightly Business Report produced by CNBC) last night, and heard Tyler Mathisen say the phrase, “Next……, but FIRST……”  REALLY, TYLER?  I enjoy NBR, and watch often.  I am a frequent viewer of  CNBC and value the excellent stock market reporting.  But REALLY, Tyler…..“Next” means directly after. Why would you keep saying “NEXT….BUT FIRST….”?.  This makes you look  a bit ignorant, as if  you forgot the definition of “Next”, which means “immediately following in time, order, importance, etc….. the next day; the next person in line, nearest or adjacent in place or position: the next room.”

Tyler, the word “next” really means, NEXT. Let’s say you are NEXT in line at the DMV waiting to get a new photo for your drivers license, and the person at the desk says, YOU ARE NEXT, BUT FIRST, LET’S HAVE THE PERSON BEHIND YOU COME TO THE DESK NOW. How would you feel, Tyler? REALLY!

Ok, I am not a SNL writer, but NBC, you get the point. Are the NBC writers of NBR placing this odd language in Tyler Mathisen’s mouth, because there are no commercials, and this is a flawed attempt at making demarcations to keep viewers glued to the set? The viewers are not that stupid, in my opinion. This technique is just plain annoying to intelligent adults as a failed ploy to keep us viewing, and for kids, it is likely to confuse  them on how to speak properly.

This  leads me to a previous concern which has perplexed me for years. NBC’s TODAY SHOW writers have the hosts say before commercial break,  “WE’RE BACK IN A MINUTE”.  The contraction “we’re” translates into “WE ARE”, which is a present moment expression. The future tense is “WE WILL BE BACK” in a minute. Are there any grammar experts out there who can set the record straight on this issue?

NBC…I am not picking on you. I just watch you more than other TV networks. Perhaps the readers of this blog could remark on the comment section below, and let us know of other TV shows or networks also botching the English language. Hopefully, we may bring attention and change to this problem of the mainstream media modeling and teaching poor language skills….REALLY!